Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (#4071)
Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Fri, 04 September 2020 06:15 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21E83A0B7B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 23:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJpEk0eP1Qcr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 23:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4993A0B78 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.39]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEF590042C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1599200128; bh=MPbpgc0TFOrHFv2ULGRMu2gdc8XSwbDZeaWZWrcJgDs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Ny/dt8U3IrxV4BdmmcC0pyolXCiUdUnvZ/xAT70EFJ3UXLadisRsPuAL7CIW3t84B Dc+VsDzVG7nOLdQP02lZBOpExdzC3AEon4qkVJ5584YeBtJjjt0MkVr9u7X7y3LlNh 9Vsxn6STblXOcdpUv4Sn4FbU1Zv8oGRD2Tvjm2wM=
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 23:15:28 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6QSUMXOA3UAWE4ZKV5LW6IBEVBNHHCSPRX6E@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4071/c686935677@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4071@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4071@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (#4071)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f51db802ef4a_366e19f01016721"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/glB9oMMsHTOC9CtZ2hgd2c_NjnA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:15:30 -0000
The issue that this is intending to address isn't about "why use a multiple of PTO for the timer" but "why use PTO, which includes max ACK delay, and not e.g. derive from SRTT". At least that is how I understood it... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4071#issuecomment-686935677
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (#407… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Benjamin Saunders
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proposed fix for #3987 (… Martin Thomson