[quicwg/base-drafts] Can CRYPTO frames be sent in 0-RTT packets? (#2959)
tandf <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 02:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331D1120099 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qIpAh3Qv3oq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73829120033 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:59:49 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1565233189; bh=lVOIcErGOzopPE+9sjOsxRPJWfpEhtkG6/svCyWUPTE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0YwPvir/0/s7t5zrO/ZgKzNQgLaqeAzfyBmJp3eUHFuuTmQ94MkYxJ4dowk2RxfIK qTDWiurITOjBF5JlGsHyq+35gNzwi7waxKutVAnqc4G7zpQJ5ZCq6hhl7hTMjRJgBg FLMk877K1v4lDuRl858PTAUy3oKqwFJO/JSlD2GM=
From: tandf <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK42H7BOPVDHEH6Y3AV3LDBKLEVBNHHBZAJF6E@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2959@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can CRYPTO frames be sent in 0-RTT packets? (#2959)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d4b902584a8f_2ee23fa7710cd96c58453a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: tandf
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gnSLD0V0lpK658qt9yC3xOWxjZQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:59:52 -0000
In quic-transport-22 section 19.6 it says CRYPTO frames can be sent in all packet types. > The CRYPTO frame (type=0x06) is used to transmit cryptographic handshake messages. It can be sent in all packet types. However in quic-tls-22 section 4 it says the CRYPTO frames can't be sent in 0-RTT packets. > CRYPTO and CONNECTION_CLOSE frames MAY appear in packets of any encryption level except 0-RTT. Also in quic-tls-22 section 8.3, similar statement. > A server MUST treat receipt of a CRYPTO frame in a 0-RTT packet as a connection error of type PROTOCOL_VIOLATION. Maybe the statement in quic-transport-22 needs to be corrected? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2959