Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack Delay and TLP (#1796)

ianswett <> Mon, 01 October 2018 01:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7367130E1F for <>; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rNLyCtTgBd3 for <>; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DFAB1294D7 for <>; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:14:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1538356488; bh=wxN5UNIx2qDujPr7ZhAkktyFpHxc1LoDs6KSE5VPI7s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BvV2jqFLtH2HuxUnU0V/KsIxsqS3OsmEIkRUqcm7xINRvFPJte4xGoXdGMfBdEuyj yigwWJ7WuB+gZq8iPcGJZzrX3ZsvP23XHcODfUsWaIz6pgQjaKVs0jclUtu3wP6Ndc /Gphe7eMXzaBy48lykcUje5Rh5Y5IrAvNmMs/BLA=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1796/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ack Delay and TLP (#1796)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bb1750859d30_3e9d3ffa0b4d45b41229fa"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 01:14:51 -0000

That is definitely a potential issue with this PR.

The nice aspect of calculating this in bytes is it's already something the sender has to track.  However, I suspect a slightly more robust approach is for the sender to count number of 'full-sized'(>=1200 byte) packets with a separate counter?  I'm happy to rewrite the PR indicating that, but would like to hear some input from you and others.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: