IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion period: text and pseudo-code don't agree (#3972)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005D3A0BE7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fuL2KjM1NQF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC813A0D60 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-fa7043e.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-fa7043e.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.109.45]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCBA840E9D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596039500; bh=9LXEB6t78iecyF8NTh/D3bD5qQWjhnCsDOvx4r/yyuQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tTDmaW6WJVtBi1GCS1s/I0HJMCsjrBi7eLcvWh1caMKnTmEFTlzCPxtakW18RTd01 LIFCJ7NzF5QUExiSOSpDigd5FENWJlieocjtl1Pd6lLPsQEnaEDFL4YkjOnk29G/V8 CjzY3i90u78a8PGgSJDkN6MPyMLiItnSfXDLI95o=
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:18:20 -0700
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZVWLWKIFPIECQMDJF5FWBEZEVBNHHCPUC7GA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972/665761529@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent congestion period: text and pseudo-code don't agree (#3972)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f21a14c49996_fa316f8165432"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hBRqAV1M8uJWT-ZiPMUqBH7jjIs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:18:59 -0000

I see two options.

Option 1: Implementing what the text says will require a new variable that records the next PN when the first RTT sample is taken.

Option 2: Changing the text to match the pseudo-code will look something like this:
```
Persistent congestion period SHOULD NOT be established until there is at least
one RTT sample.
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3972#issuecomment-665761529

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status