IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)

Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com> Wed, 22 November 2017 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C5A126DFB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mdGrXrO1sRnA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128C51200F1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:44:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=rtXn/uY/Eg/7cHHGPZA0QfoX9Ao=; b=JZOlGt0SwJSRO255 Ne/79CIn5oBidN50JNvaUwfjOlfa/i0Fh5yp/vtEBE+lR2y8v6hmAVv0xcAcxWhn ET8Frkdjmoq9DZLWU29nPCyrD9PrxqzE2aRp47jl37kLta8ToAdG++DTS+Ocy4ab JyO9NMJmUtYmOmW0MmZODW77UTs=
Received: by filter0053p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0053p1las1-22113-5A160BE0-1C 2017-11-22 23:44:32.927298287 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id UdjaM6DDRtqkxHKP2orcbA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:44:32.810 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:44:33 +0000
From: Colin Perkins <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1a5c04662a98b75770524c7f02d29ecda2c5586792cf00000001162dcde092a169ce1075d33e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956/c346502425@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Renumber packet types and invert Connection ID Flag (#956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a160be0a5a46_6d1c3fce6b774f3812513b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: csperkins
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
tracking:
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0LERQwIyx2RBR6GYhlwe7ez1LbsTXdcfYGyH dEYO6vOOhMzPzNu+SdNUnnWMGHlf0MSqs+2eN+m6O4J7xr03ls7l7XjRLkH4Px+Is2ZWFsfulzl+Kx k1+cU76RdSz1P4ycs/UmFL3N3VQZeyI7wUZWx5NhyS2+hHHympQ6uL65ob6JG+4nkvYkOidKXvj5FU 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hIfWgc-QmdEqnxPoYNIcyA3qNY0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:44:35 -0000

I haven't looked at gQUIC, but does it matter that the "server wouldn't be able to distinguish between gQUIC and short header packets"? Can it tell from the initial long header packets if the flow is gQUIC or IETF QUIC?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/956#issuecomment-346502425

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status