Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove EOED v2 (#1798)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E869D130DD3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reKbzYtg6GkH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD50126F72 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:34:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1537914841; bh=QsEd6bFoS5qfUEy7BzavKxhW3ztzsMKA2OP2T0nG6Pg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=sfHYwNPG9/S2187v9AwVXOKxxiDq8yv58UxouEToJtPnYublu4zKsZW/QUTwOaxcl oPPpsc2BocoTij82XrHBkkt44BXVmyPfukHZxo3lYEMKAGiTPpuI7oeEQgHWpgiTyj lkjwhmJjJtlOFGa97svvAM5+jF4gpCe5b40bQ2Gk=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7639d5e5709497ff36b0d8e4a12dd56129e0629492cf0000000117c279d992a169ce15adbc52@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798/review/158772196@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove EOED v2 (#1798)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5baab7d9bdf7d_242a3fe9c7ad45bc871c7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hWwyY7L376u1DU6cOKj1u5wEI5E>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:34:05 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.



> @@ -656,13 +655,14 @@ all the acknowledgements necessary to reach the same state.
 
 After all CRYPTO frames for a given encryption level have been sent and all
 expected CRYPTO frames received, and all the corresponding acknowledgments have
-been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  To limit the effect of
-packet loss around a change in keys, endpoints MUST retain packet protection
-keys for that encryption level for at least three times the current
-Retransmission Timeout (RTO) interval as defined in {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}.
-Retaining keys for this interval allows packets containing CRYPTO or ACK frames
-at that encryption level to be sent if packets are determined to be lost or new
-packets require acknowledgment.
+been received or sent, an endpoint starts a timer.  For 0-RTT keys, which do not
+carry CRYPTO frames, this timer starts when the first packets protected with

I don't think that we need to special case that - as we agreed, there are optimizations that are possible, but we don't need to describe them.  The trick here is that the sender/client might stop using 0-RTT, but the receiver/server can't as easily.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1798#discussion_r220377101