Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and acknowledgments (#743)
Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Fri, 01 September 2017 04:16 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1E2133009 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NllB0M2PYiZC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3915132E6B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:16:49 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1504239409; bh=Lqjm+7Lp6wceu8r59p3nn9Qzd7ygoy7Ij5ayX+Yl4X4=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TArZifSfee16ybSJ6RcVkc9g7ZeiVmmn5r+m1e2SvXV50iu8sZs6v7sxT4x7C5cE1 UliMeLYbtZ+Jh+7ipmgY3B2sthRRFLq8H7Dkoj6Kvd2vGaLiYf73RDf3cJg6PsLQrc Au0kJigkqbpCXRYjZqppRgsgnpKbK+aCZqzjSHEk=
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2d22f65f3c53f48c7294b6f1e5b4ee39262d64a192cf0000000115c0a13192a169ce0f025d79@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/743/326483057@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/743@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/743@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and acknowledgments (#743)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59a8df3120a9b_16053fbd23149c34882b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hdsU8Tk27WXreXY0NOJJJYmTv7A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 04:16:51 -0000
Ah, I see. Good point. Not surprisingly, I prefer the "closed when sent" interpretation. This allows a relatively clean separation between the "stream" layer (open stream accounting, flow control, etc) and the "packet layer" (packet framing, retransmissions, etc). I agree with Mike that since we no longer have max_streams it doesn't seem like there's a compelling reason to require the FIN be ACK'd in order to consider the stream closed. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Yes, the document - in its current form - is quite clear on this. The > issue exists to determine whether this is *desirable* in addition to > being documented, because we have in the past had some confusion on this > point. > -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/743#issuecomment-326483057
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and ackn… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Ryan Hamilton
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Ryan Hamilton
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stream closed state and … Mike Bishop