Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define under-utilizing the congestion window (#2675)

MikkelFJ <> Fri, 17 May 2019 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C91120161 for <>; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.606
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_Y0Ln4iPvHY for <>; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD961120151 for <>; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 05:55:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558097752; bh=rrc9le9OEDTX+DjHX7XnX0dQwx8eAbtvKWL83hh8K2A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=gYOMnYzpkPGPkeXvoUsGR77/S7shp0TobrDgJqumr9Ve8cbIU4rDHRddiViguYDzx C16HdjekVJhkUWQkAKE3ZQRky4s8cHrihlY27WBfwaLHBoMGIkHncBCJxvjW7WtyK9 lfSrEDdFo00MvAHQlLvUMoI+Z4iijJEoKx9oHtJw=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2675/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define under-utilizing the congestion window (#2675)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cdeaf58cbf51_70aa3ff3e6acd964733934"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:55:56 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> @@ -848,9 +850,10 @@ and not fully utilize the congestion window due to this delay. A sender
 should not consider itself application limited if it would have fully
 utilized the congestion window without pacing delay.
-Bursting more than an intial window's worth of data into the network might
-cause short-term congestion and losses. Implemementations SHOULD either use
-pacing or reduce their congestion window to limit such bursts.
+Sending multiple packets into the network without any delay between them
+creates a burst of load that might cause short-term congestion and losses.

The problem is that it is not clear when the next burst can be sent.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: