Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 priorities are too complex for a majority of implementations (#2739)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 22 May 2019 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE16120074 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zF5HFiN4_Oi9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13BE1200E6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 23:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 23:16:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1558505763; bh=qig6OyGpNqrcnjGIJTtPU0CjpRId4cnr0pAqk3oVczM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=L5BzyPtc5Gglmy2K130hsKyUaOPK5Q2Czu97eGd9yJvX8l5pcjPMhOAYkZkd3n31d /zb61KC3Kf6Kg+Mq6qvCxM5q1sT3o68w/53TzEKqsZlXSvdV47urN5lG0d4NUD2/Fa 2TOo9ZQuV2AAWNlBe1KG8ZQkUEyExC3j9IgiWb2k=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZKAJQMIJYYPGJG2PN26IN2HEVBNHHBVIUZ3Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2739/494667204@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2739@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2739@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 priorities are too complex for a majority of implementations (#2739)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce4e923570f9_6d133fb1812cd9641001038"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hjZwHHhJjAmdhvN_YEvepwl-6y4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 06:16:08 -0000

How much is there to gain by complex priorities where the browser has to guess vs javascript controlled lazy loaders that now the sites requirements exactly?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2739#issuecomment-494667204