Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK generation recommendation (#3304)

Jana Iyengar <> Wed, 18 December 2019 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DD2120045 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:19:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fy1LDDUqzECX for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A383E120043 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0AB6A018C for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:19:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576631986; bh=8NEor3ndK4jSTV1HTfDJqID1mcCSPbxpUqxZN/h4aV4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wD8iF3PVsrVYQVpPYC2UgjrO2w2oyFne+k4YWMz/9OS5kmM5M+Yd1NelDuThp9c2e B0OTx+iuiKBKmZGqMAGEgvvJtKoDeHDkwLdxjp3Pakmm3aNBGqrrHJmBvl5IMr0LKU gtOlLKQnsB2pjFa2dxGQTmDmwUuSW/ErXldi6OIo=
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:19:46 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3304/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK generation recommendation (#3304)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df97eb2ce248_78f63f91096cd96c1086e3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 01:19:49 -0000

@mjoras: Sorry, I misread your comment above. I was not proposing _recommending_ the 100-10-1/4RTT strategy, I was proposing _suggesting_ it. You said that the heuristic worked fine for you; did you see any performance regressions? 

You also say:
Deployments will use what ends up working better in practice and we know ACKing every other is measurably problematic (I can share numbers if people are interested).
If it isn't too much trouble, that would be super valuable.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: