Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK [editorial] Update text to include both criteria of "blocking entry". (#2937)

Bence Béky <notifications@github.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C165D1200CC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2IAF-k9vvZJ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8ABC120106 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:36:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1565886988; bh=p7rmSqh33hWJEu5Vcg13flpq2PLDW3boagLrdUrW3wQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SutEV5KaERTTBgW/04fv4U+UBTaJL/AVv1MyJqXKvExnMBT5Ft7D8/fAeJzRUJ3fw 2MoAg5y8YMgevxfM/Y0kph/idsYqmpfgphWCfl3z28Ozg4hB4dC6hX91Kma0Z9/4j7 dgwYJKFOnRL0rX5Wji4/1zJ6aqoMHEbjqN0PlfIU=
From: Bence Béky <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3CBL2UBK3VXDK3SRV3MK6IZEVBNHHBYU23SE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2937/review/275537710@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2937@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2937@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK [editorial] Update text to include both criteria of "blocking entry". (#2937)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d558a0cfbe2_14d53fe3e08cd96823206f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bencebeky
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hvH1a6Te1SK7DKgPBBcncZLjEY8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:36:44 -0000

bencebeky commented on this pull request.



> @@ -359,9 +360,9 @@ infer from this instruction that any updates to the dynamic table have been
 received.
 
 The Header Acknowledgement and Stream Cancellation instructions permit the
-encoder to remove references to entries in the dynamic table.  When entries
-have zero references they are no longer considered blocking (see
-{{blocked-insertion}}).
+encoder to remove references to entries in the dynamic table.  When an entry
+with absolute index lower than the Known Received Count has zero references,

I don't believe so.  It kind of implies that such an entry is considered blocking, which is true.  Note that if the entry is ever referenced in a header block and that reference is acknowledged, that guarantees that the Known Received Count is larger than the absolute index of the entry.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2937#discussion_r314395065