Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight should be capped by INITCWND (#3639)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 02:32 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D850B3A0809 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 19:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lTmyFNxzTQp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 19:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96EC3A07F5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 19:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.62]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E6D6A1020 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 19:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588991547; bh=xDo3lGmuQPkR6iEtPTlKWLDReko77vMjTMK62Uy7GVY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2OMa7kGevKhIq3nIFNSjSPbQvR7N5fpwWer2+D0Vamycsqi1/H2FM9D7t90JOwMZ8 1rc04KdWqoE3YC6kJlXQTj77+lYDJCx/smvrIC/df3KZane4/I7FflfqAtsO++VehU pSJfjw7uTgiXOSqKl6s+7RhV9awmAXgVT5c1ph1I=
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 19:32:27 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2SXIX3XEYRS6HQDTN4YH3TXEVBNHHCJKJEKY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3639/626091587@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3639@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3639@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight should be capped by INITCWND (#3639)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb6163bcfab8_1e943f97f1ccd968103567"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hy_GgOFmpKk_fX2wL8LBNyOWAIA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 02:32:31 -0000
I agree it should be limited to INITCWND. Here's how I read(and intended to write) the text: 1) Congestion control always applies, because I don't know of anywhere we say otherwise. 2) In addition, prior to address validation, the amplification limit of 3x also applies on the server side. Init CWND section: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md#initial-and-minimum-congestion-window-initial-cwnd -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3639#issuecomment-626091587
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight should… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server's first flight sh… ianswett