Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fixing max_ack_delay (#3938)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B883A0EBF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_sIsOtFr5Ft for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4348E3A0EBE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1dbcc59.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1dbcc59.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.54]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AF1340076 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597965899; bh=zc4gn6Zd/D5eastedfvlFT6XDLkZqM9Mb9HyHia7aAs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SxP+fTDK2YtH8I7ETFncRFhlD/w8rqlPk9k+etc+gxkfsuzB2XEEWuTrgTQpCyhx5 VeeV0xcSzEm8sK0K3ljgWaIav95xBNtxWRW8Z+NA9bPqgcM0eHxvFIqEfjK3bYU6sF e8ZrxCO9JqArnQu5QtYyLurCV+0nHOewu/mqhPPU=
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:24:59 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7CON3ZYES3EJ46VGF5JLTUXEVBNHHCPC5BAU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3938/review/472046561@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3938@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3938@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fixing max_ack_delay (#3938)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3f064bc9400_3e96196413657"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/i3UOXLTOZtXJiWrWIuknAnwOfa8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 23:25:03 -0000

@kazuho commented on this pull request.

LGTM modulo the grammatical point below.

> @@ -1092,9 +1092,10 @@ min_rtt:
 
 max_ack_delay:
 : The maximum amount of time by which the receiver intends to delay
-  acknowledgments for packets in the Application Data packet number space. The
-  actual ack_delay in a received ACK frame may be larger due to late timers,
-  reordering, or lost ACK frames.
+  acknowledgments for packets in the Application Data packet number
+  space, as defined by the eponymous transport parameter (Section 18.2
+  of {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}}). Note that the actual ack_delay in a received
+  ACK frame may be larger due to late timers, reordering, or lost

```suggestion
  ACK frame may be larger due to late timers, reordering, or loss
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3938#pullrequestreview-472046561