Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR #4956)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 15 February 2022 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A68C3A03AA
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:49:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.576, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9rOrhgZXb0uE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316403A0777
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net
(github-lowworker-e8b54ca.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.23.39])
by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F805520AE3
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:49:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1644958154;
bh=rwpmlx5xwQX5qKeGBchLkusDKat84x/TfKSq6el+sAU=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=dw95PQCJyGMBCFN0DSP0G5x86siknoUkLsmqkCEL7j5AAnLYDYKls74WY2qJutLwr
FW2Lk8JharExXON+o4l2pnlYaH0YMGzB33SiFss+QYtDSNc3pZyMdQjgwnEgm4HDlZ
Ws8SoO7HaDzBtf3rtFkd/bOYMpfc+2lQ9sERgNFU=
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:49:14 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJK6FCB53GMBMMLE5ILGAC7ZMVEVBNHHEHZVETM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4956/c1040778317@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4956@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4956@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR #4956)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_620c11ca31cd7_379c6fc499385";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/i4sgW_a1deBavsh2FHz0ZQmt1-A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:49:17 -0000
I can't comment on a line I didn't change, but at line 116, the RFC editor suggested adding a colon to produce: ``` mechanisms, a lost or reordered packet causes all active transactions to experience a stall: regardless of whether that transaction was directly impacted by the lost packet. ``` The colon doesn't make sense to me, so I currently plan to ignore it, but noting it here for review. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4956#issuecomment-1040778317 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4956/c1040778317@github.com>
- [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR #49… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RFC Editor Copyedits (PR… Mike Bishop