Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Keys need to be available to QUIC earlier (#2992)

David Schinazi <> Tue, 10 September 2019 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB0120074 for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qR75uSqM8cnp for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A6112003F for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1568154384; bh=fzw08VNGYEY3o++3/itay/xfwhWh0xHr1+DppPsD2Ug=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=r187s4WjzvgKH/YXc2p8GLciaqfDTORzkI5BJx4uj6zPl9t7DzjBFsB5VWg5s23vQ EEAwK0BL7S2g3yTK50dOwHGfVdEOlxMRfCSJZgdRpkXNsMaFNU6CZMxGpmNafEVnA/ 73JFdhYN5FMxclStzoWfFU9da3xeBnwGT+5Su5x8=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2992/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Keys need to be available to QUIC earlier (#2992)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d782310b6364_24ca3fb1ef4cd96c669e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:26:28 -0000

DavidSchinazi approved this pull request.

> @@ -495,6 +496,12 @@ client could interleave ACK frames that are protected with Handshake keys with
 0-RTT data and the server needs to process those acknowledgments in order to
 detect lost Handshake packets.
+QUIC also needs access to keys that might not ordinarily be available to a TLS
+implementation.  For instance, a client might need to acknowledge Handshake
+packets before it is ready to sent CRYPTO frames at that encryption level.  TLS

typo: ready to *send*

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: