Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8996130E3B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAKRnfPZHaJ4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2DAC130E2A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:29:29 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1529497769; bh=41STN6GZV4pls0rXgT4x4FPyN4PxdhGPJIcwd9lVWxs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BbU1NRV6kJe09NEAjT8gs9LWugjn+5Jy7O4ywTt3vEniHMzD1ITH4/7ST7g81pZEV gjumr68Aer8aiT+L1c03OwqkIAbYoVDtb8TdCitW+s70z5MltH/d1uXnSCDXmbQdy6 LciQJT8I83288mo1lli6UT4WG7zuKQr9SWvJgF3A=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5b0ecc1e2efe3393bf390768fa3574dcc614c97492cf0000000117420aa992a169ce13d69366@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1451/398731413@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1451@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1451@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b2a48a9e1c7f_24592b082e6c8f5c18555f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ihi6Hw6Sk340lhl9gd3B8C-I7F4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:29:33 -0000

@kazuho why longer than 8 octets and not >=8 octets?

I would like the simple RETRY case to work as well, which is the server doesn't want to change the CID at all, and it is the terminal node, so I don't want to require senders of RETRY to be required to change CID.

Related question: What CID is the client deriving the key for INITIAL packets from?  I was thinking all INITIAL packets used the same key, but if the terminal server may not have seen the client's first DCID, that doesn't work unless the original DCID is put somewhere the final server can read in the token.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1451#issuecomment-398731413