Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs (#2834)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 24 June 2019 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F1A1200EC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3P9aJbnmnxtL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E45FE120110 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:16:46 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1561418206; bh=3YQi8RSBwRVxqMFIiCzrI4C6hISrGjTjEWOZ9LmTJWo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xold/qxeHjrodZxXxTi10ImbUdco592GrxEfNnnRuoahhoADO4gJUFTT4rXWjhirj 9MIw1aY29O4H3iJb+TTwS+dLLDNQoNUrMCMgE22mGZDrSzNuSXTyJKar3jMD5jB1Uc xQi7kW5pTmwv8l7cChmbIa8quo5RMPB4hG/LS/LE=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYON3ZEWAYOY2MDMT53D2GF5EVBNHHBWZGHNE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834/505216115@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs (#2834)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d1159dea8257_237d3fb8e38cd968882a0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ijb7ULRPr5rckLfXR7Vcey2httw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:16:50 -0000

To restate my suggestion, above, I'd suggest:
 1) Retry can change Initial CID - Presumably that's the point of Retry?
 2) Initial can change Handshake CID
 3) Handshake can change initial 1RTT CID
 4) ORTT only changes as a result of Retry

 That provides consistency per packet type, with the exception of Retry.  Maybe we'd prefer Retry doesn't change the CID, of Initial and 0RTT, but if that's true, it seems like we should change the design of Retry?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2834#issuecomment-505216115