Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E0112708C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:44:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kz9aim9npSCs for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1445126BFD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:44:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=CHWiUPGwMQRtDZDlkPpEzMY5Si4=; b=ANU/OY+bcPsVR0Au kYYbUOZQUbkcqIPLL+PVbIsbNzJbrDIqZSam6eUSNGfgKRjgdM0nuOClhZRdaBOj 8KhhYe+5etpSMnIKr8cq6RB93p41Up+VSvB9ZTT4U9L08Sz3D2onZ6M02nQyE2dz iOCIi38X9Hz1FOIWH8mcTMzllkw=
Received: by filter0615p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0615p1iad2-15814-5A552998-13 2018-01-09 20:44:08.63971543 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0019p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id UwJayENAQBiAtaRdLeszAA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:44:08.681 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:44:08 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2f205a43570268b7f699816f693477b7aa39044792cf00000001166ceb9892a169ce111ead73@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1047/356408253@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1047@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1047@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of Frames Inappropriate for Unidirectional Streams (#1047)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a55299885752_5d072b1d95334ec8252e0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2uTbrIIiKzE+ZbSmvZSxTwfXFfxMZHNqv/+o OPkPO+2yDz0dR6Z5rs3TgNMlthvtqw65qjPt5TUyU24rOFpj23HJIRVcFqY1DLKL7vl8MXpvrVRJO7 cYnwZECOwcIacs3Ub1cmPnjkvsddoHO1YwdkHuY4mW3PDLvLYsyzPxGObLoUBIf/FwkZym5lIA5GRB Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ilWM940XFS9zcqpWLjyfU1SuIuQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:44:12 -0000

I'm happy with blowing up.  I slightly prefer blowing up the whole connection.

Dropping is dangerous and creates more complexity than is warranted.  Ignoring the frame is really bad, because it violates the rule that if a packet is acknowledged, all frames were processed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1047#issuecomment-356408253