Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D493A087D for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:08:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWrfE9sFbvC8 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out-26.smtp.github.com (out-26.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128513A087B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-lowworker-bb778fb.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-bb778fb.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.102.56]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEF45E0E5C for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:08:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595815709; bh=+dQGaiucmUPY3fLIIeDP/WfZeC3qGAbgR8rmz/jkTic=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Zh0PV34ieLdO1wqht5chgwF98RyT/qZ/P5GP0ocnobMgdaeK26uJBCVo9Nddv4wCv lgYwKyaLI8mAysSvhZvThxeS4IxswWfJ21R1TxRPMMmasSd+bQy5VtYQQLvUybwDuG rkcXZ1mfm4tGW7svvWU7JFaAaKinfr0OKuTAQxMY= Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:08:29 -0700 From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts To: quicwg/base-drafts Cc: Subscribed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest endpoints may recognize acks after loss is declared (#3956) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f1e371d2b427_73073fc27facd95c2976ec"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: tatsuhiro-t X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:08:31 -0000 ----==_mimepart_5f1e371d2b427_73073fc27facd95c2976ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not opposing adding new normative text. If new text is added, I think that the existing text should be aligned to it. In the PR, it recommends 3PTO, but the recovery draft A.1 says 1RTT. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3956#issuecomment-664081346 ----==_mimepart_5f1e371d2b427_73073fc27facd95c2976ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm not opposing adding new normative text. If new text is added, I think that the existing text should be aligned to it. In the PR, it recommends 3PTO, but the recovery draft A.1 says 1RTT.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

----==_mimepart_5f1e371d2b427_73073fc27facd95c2976ec--