Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)

ianswett <> Thu, 23 May 2019 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AF712008D for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x952AUFLQ533 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD26A120019 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=cqoHP5IZaPEeAgkCCJNUwL5luR4=; b=hp0XuuZFYl2PfAO1 5FYwo2fZ61Ndm44JfKz6j/bvXKSAhL3i51UdidfGAyAfAOHLP1gJyzJ2DzhZqaEL KQovhWQ8nvrP+27B6Dn1hdb7F64IQIm+IrWVM/GXsZ7p6cciS0t+4QHxWE/UuUzq Pl6ZIBabDRytcoSVKhMfqHOLj6s=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1786p1mdw1-1146-5CE64C6F-15 2019-05-23 07:31:59.38536956 +0000 UTC m=+200801.152465171
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id RnCCCC13QPOc8sjjb-FQWQ for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:31:59.321 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F2D3E0ED4 for <>; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 07:31:59 +0000
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2754/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Lessen the divergence from the HTTP/2 prioritization scheme by requiring all PRIORITY frames to be sent on the control stream (#2754)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce64c6f337ba_4af13fafd86cd9609440e8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2ltN5vmMJVqK9JuZe09kuYoXvMAnWkXXlDj8 8BN/Y+f7DfrlljJuLrCJmrdAdq0yESByj6hX4Jv68MkeIgizYdNIPBQk/peUSjXI6QRz/TDq8wLcf2 48sQFK1orwzmBz6IrHP5LrPHwrxLdsZMhbVVKE8ay6eLlQw6QAEYkd0ZfCTrGB2MY1iFbTSqapHh5S I=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 07:32:03 -0000

I'll attempt to summarize the issue: HTTP/2 priorities are different, but not better, and this creates implementation work and technical debt?

Previous issue introducing placeholders: #441

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: