IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RTO? (#556)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA9812EB00 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.781
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6MHVQOl23HMC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext4.iad.github.net [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECAF112EAEB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:40:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1495636841; bh=73MctkRr6CGIPgTEqNBM9CCU9+BfYylXTValOXKhRrA=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CvEPxBHC97RFh1eoO/sWbVYlGVyF1jekPFpz4AMcV4XIWfsoUzn/p1sx3RNpiRP3A NqGX2taYzuXUaFt1VQuW6voeJxPP0Wrl/yF66dA8++Gbv7OOU5B+j0sRTx3C+3E7XG RLSqP5UUbl8PmcJTpFPHivfZFke6NFAjfmV6R0QM=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab084afae6ced5e5121710b9a3e8be47645643b5fe92cf00000001153d5d6992a169ce0dc59154@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/556/303744886@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/556@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/556@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit RTO? (#556)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59259b69113d6_7ce33f8698c3bc3043332"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ivFIeYAqlgZ8bMrKKw24N5VNIG4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 14:40:44 -0000

I haven't read the details, but quic input here: different applications might want different timeouts. 60s sounds fine, but certain low latency applications might want to disconnect if it doesn't get a response much sooner than that and choose another peer. Point being, make room for this in spec.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/556#issuecomment-303744886

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status