Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 16 January 2019 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4816C124BAA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:57:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncShyri21KeY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC9B124B0C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:57:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=sPK1D1S1Tcq8naANz3LPQBqLkpg=; b=wDNql1MAB1oLUvoz 1NSpQJyiS5nF1YHS3hAcw33pyPl/b49Q9FhC8NmkGbIf4xeIDC6SPN/7z/5TaMb1 aNGEcbl4vlyDn1Afz6gngw90SSoNIYVNzTUlnDrzUfV6zej6nsf+WX+wj5tJu99k FJW8IudEQC7EGC3j2VTiNtc236w=
Received: by filter0752p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0752p1las1-7748-5C3F6267-1F 2019-01-16 16:57:11.438932155 +0000 UTC m=+149238.565279672
Received: from github-lowworker-1f7e42f.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.46]) by ismtpd0034p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 8ZYDPzyMQSGFMNRrRYxi7A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:57:11.485 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-1f7e42f.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBCCC0603 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:57:11 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab15a26ea1f376d9e18e2d7404b165fdecb738eb7c92cf000000011857246792a169ce174638d4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2135/454855460@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2135@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2135@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3f62675a75a_2b0c3fcf956d45bc2058c8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2hAuOotwT41w1JIbJbS+WN2UFmgXiGFcrW4+ T138po+JRa/RjTblovSTb/1k77it76ELVhvmtTA26K4owDrP7E92yG1855MSp/Fd7ZXwo+ChBUI2jH w6TXRUWsUT1z/DCyaIEE/PqHyllzTuSzRtyYBxVlmg7UFylIQZQXSNbrOA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ixAjIL4dKe9xz-eGWDaReDO4DRo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:57:14 -0000

There's a section on address validation which should prevent reflection attacks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-17#section-8

This issue is about what the client can send.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2135#issuecomment-454855460