IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)

mirjak <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9953A080B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAOm9TqlWIWN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2FDB3A0902 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-d1d6e31.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d1d6e31.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.50]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EDCA041C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591363374; bh=Nd/QJW4qpObElInAdxCrqA+iRPrhP3f02r2HurZckoc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mTEpNzYzP+0+DSpd5ONqNJN8Q6wPSoPHRAGOYUWJZ8NSNMQ8roe9AfbT1RcjllFIs Xf5YYe2CiL0amrQ1y0D1de8vyW42P7v52W52OBQPFe5wg6u6duj96xpYSTFAL9wUHP U5SLTHZ1p1Xlp5WONcvAxZT1bUN/DsVcanKBSpk4=
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 06:22:54 -0700
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZYR3GXODPFVY6XBX544YUC5EVBNHHCLJE5JM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733/639476779@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Question on ECN validation (#3733)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eda472ee074a_7afb3f8f964cd960125430"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jCfIB3uBlxkGjtBkd8p0zj1Aij4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:23:58 -0000

Yes, sorry, in the text you don't compare the total increase to the local value of course. You compare the total increase to the number of packets  acknowledged in an ACK frame

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3733#issuecomment-639476779

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status