Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames to describe varint structures (#3115)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 04:17 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D570F120046 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZHW8W5kcTqH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0DB12008C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.27]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428E61C2623 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572322668; bh=Ag4hOUgjI92GHEMmSsxP+uCyqoyEUbE7CnXqYra/DlY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ClZxdlY+VB1o41czq4TLi24wOvcTR3A8iVz2f7cYMba4FXKyZ4J+Z4tAYMFXWdz5t 7W4RU462nrdnefjwK72O8Xi11Em6sv6sNMYQE2RwZORy4Kdn0YyyJEssFrZVwzbpxx EM2MTh80j6CSh9+lE7LQ7dK1jMEZtQUfc413lZXA=
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:17:48 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6QVHI7QIN2LM5NCZV3YTX6ZEVBNHHB4UPZEI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3115/547249150@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3115@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3115@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames to describe varint structures (#3115)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db7bd6c33c7d_1913faa70acd9601489cb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jIZ7Dmuut-KkCRD-NiPT7heP-fw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:17:51 -0000
In addition to my previous point that the notations of HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 should better be aligned, I'm inclined to argue that using three different notations in three related drafts (QUIC, TLS, HTTP/3) would be a nightmare. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3115#issuecomment-547249150
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames to d… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Nick Harper
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Nick Harper
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Robin Marx
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Don't use bitmap frames … Martin Thomson