Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification limit apply to PTO packets? (#3413)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 14:58 UTC

Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:58:23 -0800
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4VMEXNHVYQ4WHVMHN4JAFI7EVBNHHCCXPLHM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3413/582447283@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3413@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3413@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification limit apply to PTO packets? (#3413)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3ad80ff34dc_4a603fd0d1ccd968603b6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jWO6PhyjROF_aLyoSLdDMyZY598>

Repeating what I said earlier: it's not clear to me that not being able to arm the PTO timer when at the limit implies that PTO packets count against the amplification limit. The reason is that you could have *already* armed the PTO timer at the time you hit the limit. E.g., you might be streaming 0.5RTT and so send Initial, Handshake, arm timer, <wait> 0.5RTT.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3413#issuecomment-582447283

[quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification limit… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification l… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification l… ekr
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification l… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does the amplification l… ianswett