Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 03:34:16 -0800
From: Luca Niccolini <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab047d308d9686b5d71c5a641509371e4aa619975e92cf00000001181f79b892a169ce170ba08e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090/c444454787@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] create codec streams only when necessary
 (#2090)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c07b7b8489bb_42eb3f81c86d45b46510fb";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jjTiDa5FdxXQUv3z7fmdhDl1brc>


----==_mimepart_5c07b7b8489bb_42eb3f81c86d45b46510fb
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I stand with @martinthomson on this. I feel like optimizing the common us=
ecase for constrained devices would significantly increase complexity of =
the implementation. =0D
Could we instead relax the constraint that qpack streams (being control s=
treams) cannot be closed, and allow an endpoint that doesn=E2=80=99t want=
 to do qpack to not open its control streams and to immediately reset (wi=
th a specific error code, yeah I know YAEC) the peer initiated qpack stre=
ams? =0D
On the endpoint receiving the reset this would be a connection error if t=
he received table size was not zero. =0D
=0D
-- =0D
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.=0D
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:=0D
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-444454787=

----==_mimepart_5c07b7b8489bb_42eb3f81c86d45b46510fb
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>I stand with <a class=3D"user-mention" data-hovercard-type=3D"user" da=
ta-hovercard-url=3D"/hovercards?user_id=3D67641" data-octo-click=3D"hover=
card-link-click" data-octo-dimensions=3D"link_type:self" href=3D"https://=
github.com/martinthomson">@martinthomson</a> on this. I feel like optimiz=
ing the common usecase for constrained devices would significantly increa=
se complexity of the implementation.<br>=0D
Could we instead relax the constraint that qpack streams (being control s=
treams) cannot be closed, and allow an endpoint that doesn=E2=80=99t want=
 to do qpack to not open its control streams and to immediately reset (wi=
th a specific error code, yeah I know YAEC) the peer initiated qpack stre=
ams?<br>=0D
On the endpoint receiving the reset this would be a connection error if t=
he received table size was not zero.</p>=0D
=0D
<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&m=
dash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre=
ad.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quic=
wg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-444454787">view it on GitHub</a>, o=
r <a href=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq6lbDu=
gI4tU_i9TCRCPx0FTi2tsmks5u1684gaJpZM4Y9x8E">mute the thread</a>.<img src=3D=
"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq4cVc_ngiGi6PrncnI-u8GyyQDg8=
ks5u1684gaJpZM4Y9x8E.gif" height=3D"1" width=3D"1" alt=3D"" /></p>=0D
<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_versio=
n":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name"=
:"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"=
quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"http=
s://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_=
image_url":"https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_cards/avat=
ar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicw=
g/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@lnic=
co in #2090: I stand with @martinthomson on this. I feel like optimizing =
the common usecase for constrained devices would significantly increase c=
omplexity of the implementation. \r\nCould we instead relax the constrain=
t that qpack streams (being control streams) cannot be closed, and allow =
an endpoint that doesn=E2=80=99t want to do qpack to not open its control=
 streams and to immediately reset (with a specific error code, yeah I kno=
w YAEC) the peer initiated qpack streams? \r\nOn the endpoint receiving t=
he reset this would be a connection error if the received table size was =
not zero. "}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.=
com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-444454787"}}}</script>=0D
<script type=3D"application/ld+json">[=0D
{=0D
"@context": "http://schema.org",=0D
"@type": "EmailMessage",=0D
"potentialAction": {=0D
"@type": "ViewAction",=0D
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-4=
44454787",=0D
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-4444=
54787",=0D
"name": "View Pull Request"=0D
},=0D
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",=0D
"publisher": {=0D
"@type": "Organization",=0D
"name": "GitHub",=0D
"url": "https://github.com"=0D
}=0D
},=0D
{=0D
"@type": "MessageCard",=0D
"@context": "http://schema.org/extensions",=0D
"hideOriginalBody": "false",=0D
"originator": "AF6C5A86-E920-430C-9C59-A73278B5EFEB",=0D
"title": "Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] create codec streams only when necessa=
ry (#2090)",=0D
"sections": [=0D
{=0D
"text": "",=0D
"activityTitle": "**Luca Niccolini**",=0D
"activityImage": "https://assets-cdn.github.com/images/email/message_card=
s/avatar.png",=0D
"activitySubtitle": "@lnicco",=0D
"facts": [=0D
=0D
]=0D
}=0D
],=0D
"potentialAction": [=0D
{=0D
"name": "Add a comment",=0D
"@type": "ActionCard",=0D
"inputs": [=0D
{=0D
"isMultiLine": true,=0D
"@type": "TextInput",=0D
"id": "IssueComment",=0D
"isRequired": false=0D
}=0D
],=0D
"actions": [=0D
{=0D
"name": "Comment",=0D
"@type": "HttpPOST",=0D
"target": "https://api.github.com",=0D
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"IssueComment\",\n\"repositoryFullName\": \=
"quicwg/base-drafts\",\n\"issueId\": 2090,\n\"IssueComment\": \"{{IssueCo=
mment.value}}\"\n}"=0D
}=0D
]=0D
},=0D
{=0D
"name": "Close pull request",=0D
"@type": "HttpPOST",=0D
"target": "https://api.github.com",=0D
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"PullRequestClose\",\n\"repositoryFullName\=
": \"quicwg/base-drafts\",\n\"pullRequestId\": 2090\n}"=0D
},=0D
{=0D
"targets": [=0D
{=0D
"os": "default",=0D
"uri": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2090#issuecomment-4444=
54787"=0D
}=0D
],=0D
"@type": "OpenUri",=0D
"name": "View on GitHub"=0D
},=0D
{=0D
"name": "Unsubscribe",=0D
"@type": "HttpPOST",=0D
"target": "https://api.github.com",=0D
"body": "{\n\"commandName\": \"MuteNotification\",\n\"threadId\": 4188485=
16\n}"=0D
}=0D
],=0D
"themeColor": "26292E"=0D
}=0D
]</script>=

----==_mimepart_5c07b7b8489bb_42eb3f81c86d45b46510fb--