Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language for stateless reset (#2574)
Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C721200FB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43LG-OxIES4D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F8712001E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 17:29:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554424172; bh=hQsuklE8eE+JqgouKHyt+HicSmIIIGMbSSx0RAlqfMc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1gGA4FqlrkPv+tttWl0LvEB0SLOncCDbTx0lgO5pa680BSLIk+Hb/xn/wueet7jNY mTiWLVV6XKPBvmjcv0GMDbJWmO9FMQ+ryjvocRIZF7Xq9OtY/u2kOm4usyNwQdm4mI yuO1/fw6blgR0sTGSxmrIq2M6INwR42HwnlReBIU=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3942438445899f8f3c9113fe73399c26465c15c892cf0000000118be636c92a169ce197bb0c1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574/review/223059429@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language for stateless reset (#2574)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca6a16c3fc4c_37903fac3ded45bc8083b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jocMTYo5rBmZqPYR1gJnTtwAUgQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:29:35 -0000
janaiyengar commented on this pull request. > @@ -2350,11 +2344,13 @@ valid QUIC packets. With the set of AEAD functions defined in {{QUIC-TLS}}, packets that are smaller than 21 bytes are never valid. An endpoint MAY send a stateless reset in response to a packet with a long -header. This would not be effective if the stateless reset token was not yet -available to a peer. In this QUIC version, packets with a long header are only -used during connection establishment. Because the stateless reset token is not -available until connection establishment is complete or near completion, -ignoring an unknown packet with a long header might be more effective. +header and MAY send a stateless reset that is formatted to appear as a packet +with a long header. Sending a stateless reset is not effective prior to the This is odd. Why do we allow stateless reset to be sent as a long header if the peer is only looking for it in short header packets? > @@ -2350,11 +2344,13 @@ valid QUIC packets. With the set of AEAD functions defined in {{QUIC-TLS}}, packets that are smaller than 21 bytes are never valid. An endpoint MAY send a stateless reset in response to a packet with a long -header. This would not be effective if the stateless reset token was not yet -available to a peer. In this QUIC version, packets with a long header are only -used during connection establishment. Because the stateless reset token is not -available until connection establishment is complete or near completion, -ignoring an unknown packet with a long header might be more effective. +header and MAY send a stateless reset that is formatted to appear as a packet +with a long header. Sending a stateless reset is not effective prior to the +stateless reset token being available to a peer. In this QUIC version, packets +with a long header are only used during connection establishment. Because the +stateless reset token is not available until connection establishment is +complete or near completion, ignoring an unknown packet with a long header might +be more effective. ```suggestion be more effective than sending a stateless reset in response to it. ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2574#pullrequestreview-223059429
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language for s… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Ryan Hamilton
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add normative language f… Jana Iyengar