Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 November 2018 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1752B12426A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:34:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ou-3b5srBG8Z for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:34:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59524130E04 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:34:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:34:53 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542155693; bh=LRiC6ZaCPo+jSQy1UzYJrM4hSBOZ4UYuv7P8sVm3iPY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RWbI5sng85S5fovxf1Hobwy3EeG7wopFni1lLpMN+hfXiVvNXc56cInxj+DinjLtv ngkznuvjh7rKuYaUY6HQtL845scbBZEn8U4WeoQuaRAMzZIlrPuL7T5EeaZKZes06R CEbaz+HaR9pJDSrl6/7R7spCS4OwuTXXoe4j/Q00=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc181e7eaf4fb8dd794a8cd0426aa9d7db2ba152d92cf0000000118032fad92a169ce169ea5c2@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1989/438492618@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1989@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1989@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beb6dad56c65_23253fd1436d45bc30584d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jpd0pSf18A6bFCwXtTtqTaucFlg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:34:57 -0000

@janaiyengar Just my personal impression of that one particular discussion. Doesn't matter.

What matters is how we use this frame type field. We can decide that it's too late in the process to change the wire format, and just leave it there. We would need a lot of additional text how to properly use it though, see my examples in https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1989#issue-379495874. I would prefer to actually define a format that makes sense.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1989#issuecomment-438492618