IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 23 February 2018 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B6D12D93E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDRysj5nYQ3Q for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext5.iad.github.net [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B956C126BFD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:48:54 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1519354134; bh=HLpnD1QtdVbDefzaskvXWDQjBSPrg435MYSI8ICR2zU=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XLBzfliD+3/N6n5HDs3c8z6AcwupHjIX/6tU0uiGm8wrREuareKscl7Gxkgp7+q8L IBIQp7E1hy137Bx0lN1vT4pJKBX0qSszDTcTcecL9oTuRPTGvJvMOMk4El3Cg8Joop Gu3B94XPOcs2pAOyF8lgijsK6WVekTdJB0nd7J8w=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab921068905915b05ce99cbe6f1516d6143dda59d892cf0000000116a7431692a169ce0de8f806@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569/367893749@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] does version negotiation packet format need to be locked across versions (#569)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5a8f8116d76f4_135f3fe4dcebcf341967fd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jqEqVBotwx21wdHaa_2OJxvU-R0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:48:57 -0000

Given we've adopted the invariants draft, I think we can close this, unless we're being cautious and want to wait for last call on invariants?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/569#issuecomment-367893749

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status