Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Thu, 12 May 2022 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1B2C159482 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.575, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsRumyLYbCdQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF08CC157B51 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-7f00a19.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-7f00a19.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.113.68]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369EF900303 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 12:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1652384453; bh=foDHz/niyNZGcCsYAGm0ZIhHBdt7BXkiGKFNPl+XfsE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=p4Uo7gGA4dIk2bwbpg9Hok2ABiRujgmjCWxoaKb9DvNQMqM9HY7CzoMxZCkfhqG80 1H7ImGfOf0AfxoZPqTmtLiYqZFyXCzavmkNVB2FDvsHZ7FPONaZkExCqEqN/BDy2Sb PBRAPWlecqmasb18/h1Yt5LrDAio2j4lFNxRavO8=
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:40:53 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZ5J5BPL52BDPN7TQ6ARKKULEVBNHHEMZM6EI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issue/4968/issue_event/6600960910@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended? (comment 2) (Issue #4968)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_627d62c527d07_301d408118066"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kGYYnqZ4lMB8VCI89F13-f8MHoU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 19:40:54 -0000
Closed #4968. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4968#event-6600960910 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issue/4968/issue_event/6600960910@github.com>
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" intended… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is "to the encoder" inte… Mike Bishop