Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Given recommendations on when/how often to send ACK frames (#230)

acmacm <notifications@github.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CA1129459 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:48:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJD8KDTCwdkr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:48:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADBE112944B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:48:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=+sVZtwef0BsxEF73uBsSbuKenow=; b=rjDnT/Bpyv6Jau4J u5B6b6hDS4AfP/cB6NRTjFjmo7vWpVcz7Z1A+ID99SUOP+Qj6ygTCwr1enbJWyud pl20SvxqhTqvNagYi/aOVRkk7yCA9gPqUzv+GbVJkyWIUJgszealCWSkgxrc6VFM yYV4jOp49yO3Db8QZ5cBJTZ8Ne4=
Received: by filter0034p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0034p1las1-22899-58B76BBB-4E 2017-03-02 00:47:55.835331293 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id QRlH7GbPTByIXBvWjqOt1A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:47:55.590 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:47:55 -0800
From: acmacm <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/230/283520371@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/230@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/230@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Given recommendations on when/how often to send ACK frames (#230)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58b76bbb77c58_1f83fd5ebaa1c3838793"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: acmacm
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3AGxwsaGV4eye5JPxrkcfkA6mSyqpZ0zZTdM TPtg5YkjOrduc+Qr3aqU5x2mj8+F74RXrgdYYr0qp5iWXI/GNCahHM/R1jdi63iFDBDUgYVeeEwL5s 0H9OzW1cxirXgLGiBkAmhWW4zLF/V/qaEx3khoEMkkga0bMGs+I/u1c9fWCvhx2ZfXpISTPM4P6EMb 0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kJM2BwyCuI2LZkeiizA3AwKMLIQ>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:48:21 -0000

I suggest to make any requirement on ACK reduction simple (1 ACK : N Packets Received). For reasons I'm sorting-through (and may have to wait till Chicago), I suspect that 1:1 should be allowed because feedback helps understand performance. (acmacm is Al Morton)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/230#issuecomment-283520371