[quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too strong (#2199)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 03:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C63E130E54 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:20:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8QU_ryAiQS1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22868130E43 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:20:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545016832; bh=rNdl/QU5YwCRMcv9oRODqM+dqIo2dG2isjPjQ9ixG68=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GxNfra/mXffaN9LDmtXRSbQ9q6AWumrgWfmd8cD/yQ1r71QncewAA1I4QodKIcI3t Ey8XGsavsSY0kCGL7aoZFNdn2NSSKX2DrZdtZancV2XWo3LpUPNPinK07vMqNL7dUj hLp6y0PoaBHURPeVqa0ZqrQl66jOgTCTEuEGolh8=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab790276048a8196214ac1931ae0cfccdd00308ba692cf00000001182ed80092a169ce17567c54@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2199@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too strong (#2199)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1716001fcac_72033fdcff2d45bc2638ec"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kYZYd1wULPKBUquRTrGO-2iWSkI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 03:20:35 -0000
>From @ekr: >> Once an ACK frame has been acknowledged, the packets it acknowledges SHOULD NOT be acknowledged again. > Suppose that I receive 1 3 5, and I ack these, and that ACK is acked. I then receive 2, 4, 6. This advice would have me send an ACK frame with three ranges, whereas I could send one range. I think that the advice here is that ranges are dropped when all ACKs for all packets in that range have been acknowledged. Or something along those lines. Maybe: > An endpoint SHOULD omit an ACK Range if it has received an acknowledgment for its acknowledgments of all packets in that range. Though that seems clumsy. Better words would be appreciated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2199
- [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too strong… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too st… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too st… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too st… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK of ACK advice too st… Martin Thomson