IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow endpoints to generate traffic keys asynchronously (#3874)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9FA3A0A6E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTcjADHXwBXr for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750C83A0BC5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.18.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97594600E4B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1596678604; bh=nL6b+bAT2ctnFKX4ndayRox6bP2XsrtUh78tVrUxRM4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yCA1KcDhmf/KAwtetwxv7x+gR7uzRDs5KqwEQsDO26nKUboKex4Rk5tsEqMCcUjyb Z1aR6FoYxZPEqSwSJ7JsYvsKU707mQ+xFaxoyuRBZPGzUUSLYtZQaKPbbJV4j8WvLZ njhuvJ4YYQ4oZ+owYbNCCiin+ApokN7MBWoCpLBc=
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:50:04 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3S6EZTOWVMSZZ7HGN5G5BMZEVBNHHCN3MY3A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874/review/462133511@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow endpoints to generate traffic keys asynchronously (#3874)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f2b61cc879a0_393c16f838767b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kb4ZMu5ngJCWq9xmfruiDJ4Wbz0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 01:50:07 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



>  
 When adjusting an RTT sample using peer-reported acknowledgement delays, an
 endpoint:
 
-- MUST ignore the ACK Delay field of the ACK frame for packets sent in the
-  Initial and Handshake packet number space.
+- MAY ignore the acknowledgement delay for Initial packets,

Sorry, read it backwards.  Nevermind.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3874#discussion_r466098283

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email