Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:55:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4aba5c05aa4ff57817450beed5098fdee1c153df3d992cf0000000116c6a24992a169ce12419296@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1232@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACKs for receiver-only (#1232)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5aaee049c0bf8_2bde3fa2e74b0f2c1497a2";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kbtJ0ahwm_4_4_xxayITOKI7rrE>

----==_mimepart_5aaee049c0bf8_2bde3fa2e74b0f2c1497a2
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"A receiver that is only sending ACK frames will not receive acknowledgments for
its packets.  Sending an occasional MAX_DATA or MAX_STREAM_DATA frame as data is
received will ensure that acknowledgements are generated by a peer.  Otherwise,
an endpoint MAY send a PING frame once per RTT to solicit an acknowledgment."

But this isn't true if the counterparty piggybacks ACKs in its packets that contain STREAM data (which is at least what I do!), and why I filed #1231. Is this really the behavior we want?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1232
----==_mimepart_5aaee049c0bf8_2bde3fa2e74b0f2c1497a2
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p>"A receiver that is only sending ACK frames will not receive acknowledgments for<br>
its packets.  Sending an occasional MAX_DATA or MAX_STREAM_DATA frame as data is<br>
received will ensure that acknowledgements are generated by a peer.  Otherwise,<br>
an endpoint MAY send a PING frame once per RTT to solicit an acknowledgment."</p>
<p>But this isn't true if the counterparty piggybacks ACKs in its packets that contain STREAM data (which is at least what I do!), and why I filed <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load issue title" data-id="306285930" data-permission-text="Issue title is private" data-url="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1231" href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1231">#1231</a>. Is this really the behavior we want?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1232">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq8BmnCVzBtUKohSlANhlkughU_3pks5tftfJgaJpZM4SvZRo">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq_hgyjOCgmMZQofjdPZtjYcwoKg1ks5tftfJgaJpZM4SvZRo.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1232"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"DESCRIPTION","message":"ACKs for receiver-only (#1232)"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1232"}}}</script>
----==_mimepart_5aaee049c0bf8_2bde3fa2e74b0f2c1497a2--