IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)

Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Wed, 11 July 2018 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4F2130EC0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-RJ4oTtttYy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BFA130DE0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:10:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531278656; bh=F4g/M63Yrt19cWwE0das9RoRY45wz9GPyY7a0cRHR2Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=cR2/XUY+QyCi1OWT0DLcGLTa11yK0l9/Kb+MdMvViTNtsXEQCB0WLBYrS6sswdpC1 z7lsZDY6LmPi7qummqC6hblMjnKLTrycZxfWAthXxpaiia/7ECTSTeY8Spk/BPDbQj Xa7QToSrM5O406pIUb2glQA5wyzCquTibRS2cmOw=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab030cc37c71d24b3c12faaa08a637870705a2e2c792cf00000001175d374092a169ce14138c09@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1498/review/136078080@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1498@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1498@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b457540b98be_111a03ff67e3a8f7c7812e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kvYSztedscIy91ZA7k7DcSDFBoA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 03:11:00 -0000

huitema commented on this pull request.



>  
-The first Initial packet contains a packet number of 0. Each packet sent after
-the Initial packet is associated with a packet number space and its packet
-number increases monotonically in that space (see {{packet-numbers}}).
+The first Initial packet sent by either endpoint contains a packet number of

Certainly not MUST. Consider the case where the Initial packet is resent after a version negotiation, or repeated after time-out. Then the "natural" value of the sequence number will be 1. I don't see how saying "must be zero" would improve interoperability. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1498#discussion_r201553912

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status