IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames and congestion/flow control (#1811)

Rui Paulo <notifications@github.com> Sat, 29 September 2018 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EEC130E64 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfHUYTzgxijY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0F8130E35 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:41:36 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1538257296; bh=ByTfZqnKJNYFJPmUywUWpWrGRsappWOMMvK7o77hZXU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uz1/Oy1ndvB/bGC7hB5KtyazZJTN7oMjFViDYFGQ23zHCGaPDf+mhZUs/DFrZ3mX1 xtz7m9IuXO9PE/W3RRLO+ulvbFmaqGqC0xroL+eMmImpg6n+kP+lAL0UD+eShnfNdF hA6Z1BdAasgZwyZsaLM5sHDqbk9GoarfxCSWZhFo=
From: Rui Paulo <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab27d6784211b80ccacc477d5ffad3ca24171fed4192cf0000000117c7b39092a169ce15bedb09@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1811/c425677378@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1811@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1811@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames and congestion/flow control (#1811)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5baff19031724_1afa3f9a7b8d45b47711c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: rpaulo
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/kyLTKdNIeRpPtK4NxlDcLWBfO_w>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:41:41 -0000

The requirement that it MUST be ACK'ed seems too strong.  Doesn't that prevent us from doing a completely unreliable stream?  I am aware that the current DATAGRAM proposals require ACKs but I don't agree with this PR.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1811#issuecomment-425677378

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status