IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add a section on flow control performance (#3793)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Fri, 26 June 2020 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDA43A1231 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNK8rWF4n-RE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E823A1166 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1b8c660.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.18.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57501121099 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1593169144; bh=ldJiKn7Pb+8k7WT4Lb0LwYEwUQz1PDPR9CY5navnR5I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wTZ9HgYT6isBRPeDouzOX02UpjUUDwNxpjsVqWuaKHBvLLH1Ch5XjLF70ZF9q9WuP BhL/mPwiRU0LC4uMTDScotO8Zuij8q+aL6IpUC51NJ/i22IxvlAJijf5FuJvvF6VQb Jy7/Ul3NayST6XjZzao2wyvo0JnCG++SjyBBSit4=
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:59:04 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY5QCTZVEC4WKG4BOV5AG27REVBNHHCNAR3C4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3793/review/438203166@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3793@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3793@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add a section on flow control performance (#3793)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ef5d4f8121eb_72723f9c7a6cd96899491"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/l013BqqmTU7vHkACXOAO6rMrzog>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:59:06 -0000

@larseggert commented on this pull request.



> @@ -968,6 +968,24 @@ signal before advertising additional credit, since doing so will mean that the
 peer will be blocked for at least an entire round trip, and potentially for
 longer if the peer chooses to not send STREAMS_BLOCKED frames.
 
+## Flow Control Performance
+
+Unlike TCP, QUIC decouples flow control from congestion control. This can

TCP doesn't couple CC and FC either? The receive window is independent of cwnd. (There are some autotuning implementations that couple them, but the spec doesn't.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3793#pullrequestreview-438203166

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status