IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 27 November 2018 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C9112D4E7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgfg49mJwWVj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0781277BB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=CqT9JwSBNyH52WGK/6wzRFUwh14=; b=MQHWMLhQ789BVT7V 3rikIYLFcyq7vepGtgorhBMpEdOmbxIhmixbaMw/iZ2SvHTP9LnX5RtJVvQfqZcP Nrs6w+xEcOZpAUYj6tVB7NfrhMSsFN+VEBn01UGbfxt7fqlsqIYTVLLCHaroZ3mF szvgcObjpLLiZLBz5fnOPiZGYO0=
Received: by filter1211p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1211p1las1-8219-5BFD665D-21 2018-11-27 15:44:29.615294845 +0000 UTC m=+1012944.662222705
Received: from github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.35]) by ismtpd0033p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id CGi4Xo8cRKSOC0VxjPZGNg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:44:29.508 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-cef7735.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709E71E00BC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:44:29 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba697995cd8c20df88bba7539c3577d3ab4ef81aa92cf000000011815285d92a169ce16e756f7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052/442106240@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfd665d6e221_24523fdf16ed45c4223336"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3W/4WFxvtmKoUwRZnSa7wT3SKJkpBVpnwUyc 59VGJUbZ0HPPvaPEbQEJEctOMU56JZkIJCyY/H+40qlosfdAZP0X2VoDIBTf2THv3qPcIYv+Xujndz IH12QDvyjOmGISn9dcT4fXBkO9kANGTmrum2Zn5QwOahbyCIkQsV7sQfNPXNAnk0lrh5B3MKnFOCcD 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/l3ZA5lGYb5fgU5Thi1QMm42zLjY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:44:33 -0000

To clarify, this is a case when alarms wake up late, since ideally if this was negative, the alarm should have executed, correct?

I think the easiest fix that fits with how most alarms work is to allow negative values and say they mean execute ASAP.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052#issuecomment-442106240

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email