Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding before receiving a packet protected with new keys (#4079)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 00:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4869B3A0B76 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zqwbGeojPP8L for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AEE73A0B73 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1ac52d7.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1ac52d7.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5E2900431 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1599610010; bh=/zo+BZ4pgfhSqCHRz9yJdZNmJ+zTMi2Ena8h8vdh/cs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RXfzOos+7q2gYI6PADQJFj1Mni4h7/WPT8kUBu+BdlRs/krRBLacLuC98k5tNcfTC 5j9/t4JS6PpKUrRJV5Dw84oEIaU6PK1w+jVkuF3I2GNLhlTbhVU8lmFdI1SULE40k2 +13o9cGpqjyLrhs+QB7qzAc9SbG4MFfrEM9ujzQE=
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:06:50 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYE664TFZLMPR5Y4I55MP6ZVEVBNHHCS6GFAM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4079/review/484529391@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4079@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4079@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding before receiving a packet protected with new keys (#4079)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f581c9abc04e_4f1619f0129471"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/lC3fNOl9_BIOa5uR3mCXTjLZC94>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:06:53 -0000
@martinthomson approved this pull request. This is a good change. The MUST regarding retention is already (strongly) implied, so it's not a normative change. But we definitely benefit from this being direct. I just have a tiny editorial suggestion. > @@ -1496,10 +1496,11 @@ The endpoint that initiates a key update also updates the keys that it uses for receiving packets. These keys will be needed to process packets the peer sends after updating. -An endpoint SHOULD retain old keys so that packets sent by its peer prior to -receiving the key update can be processed. Discarding old keys too early can -cause delayed packets to be discarded. Discarding packets will be interpreted -as packet loss by the peer and could adversely affect performance. +An endpoint MUST retain old keys until it has successfully unprotected a packet +sent using the new keys. An endpoint SHOULD NOT discard old keys immediately SHOULD NOT isn't a thing. you want ```suggestion sent using the new keys. An endpoint SHOULD retain old keys for some time ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4079#pullrequestreview-484529391
- [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding before… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] forbid key discarding be… Martin Thomson