Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifiers not varints? (#2233)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 31 January 2019 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC7B130EBA for <>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3MEgIBBiuiI for <>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BA1128CE4 for <>; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:55:50 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548932150; bh=0SB+2XEdTxsDUCGdRNA1pXI/r2tYujTRo6FhNcfZzsQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=voXj8hqj6oC9F5X9DU9OrMFmyQSejkS8gduBTb9y+Qzz5Rc+o3mah1Doh9xTAqH8C /V/ipcEEZVWMxZgy3B5TyPK8i1bbmwHZ5PznfeGsx78HNJLjWs+vHQDnDwUZ0z8HE9 D1CusN9Dws9KB9ozbtJyfsCX+YxQm0dSBQ7PcbhQ=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2233/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are setting identifiers not varints? (#2233)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c52d43630372_43573f98470d45c0626175"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:55:53 -0000

No, the conclusion was to not require minimal encoding for anything.  There is a performance argument for QUIC frames because they are used very frequently, but even that has been challenged.  The minimal encoding is only a miniscule amount more efficient, and it's more annoying to create.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: