IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility (#1260)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D52612D868 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtxiiNSKwiuF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B00D12D952 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=KR2wiKRX3pDqS/KO7GosV3+L0yM=; b=AV1Bx3bMVCXzTW/e eUg0XTZxYn0IKDmCHfYZH5u9GTHBnxkhk9jXcfIqOzzN97YmmU2vGMnELh5t2Rl1 mR1d/yiuAMvpq+I6QiAgpu/JjpMgv28XzBUy8DAdMGrb2UMC7UbMi0sWXY8acX3V nQT2L6YHJoYPDC7CSo7jzaf4lYo=
Received: by filter0084p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0084p1las1-18818-5AC27860-2F 2018-04-02 18:37:20.395000266 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) by ismtpd0009p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 26m3px4CRMKWuJK5eNoSSA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:37:20.304 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:37:20 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd043869e44eb6da2da4722a44cb3079eda432ac392cf0000000116da3a6092a169ce1282df76@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260/378005245@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Invariants extensbility (#1260)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ac27860405f7_f2b3fdbe05c8f2c157056"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0++aS2TUDhAhteuBDFFYjLY5I/aVOEEw9xlq WNQRUZqestfaIfY4Ju8p6rnz4SWq4atDcB2k40z7i8uQxSlSCS4U4id7yebiyjwo1DBBsBsdut/MAh BPjRCJJyhi7q2EkIuLdxXgYg3qzapf+p0Jn8njO1C6oR+rxZk29uFgtIkwDDRCc6IyIqi9N9RT26iy I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/lGblJUIFJHzw6s6b1Pfn72TsJ54>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:37:23 -0000

In the long header, it would need to come after the connection IDs.
In the short header, it could go anywhere after the first byte, since there are no constraints in the current invariants draft.

Can you clarify the issue?  Is this an editorial request for clarity on how future versions of the invariants might change from the current one, or something else?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1260#issuecomment-378005245

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status