Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify when the PTO may need to be recomputed and reset (#3665)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 May 2020 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CCE3A11BF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEh6rmfqcImu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-10.smtp.github.com (out-10.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E9A3A11BC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.84]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D121204D1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1589927436; bh=gPM53BcpuL1hqf8Ceusn6+HFaPTOP3WzTsjFA4fO7cI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=IWrS51wEI9w6TtWsXe6ktAQn4bujwbQxhqMQspdCXuU1ajpJw4wz5HmV1W5lAccXf 1GTNhp9N7Is70HgHoacAvLO9hxwpUFYmTnCu8k/UyNlYngoKl96Qyao7khWHndogeb w7IrZCGHUWqSXCZanwHIA5TznibR79AZMRGFisdU=
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:30:36 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7ALDZSXUV4JYYSMB542A7QZEVBNHHCJ5PG2I@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3665/review/414868507@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3665@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3665@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify when the PTO may need to be recomputed and reset (#3665)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ec45e0cc9ea_111d3f7eb5acd9601767f1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/lLVk_80XBR6z8KpWP6VCy1i95UQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 22:30:38 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



> +PTO period being set to twice its current value. The PTO backoff is reset upon
+receiving an acknowledgement, except when a client receives an acknowledgment
+from a server prior to the server validating the client address. A client
+keeps increasing the PTO backoff until the server's address validation
+completes to ensure the client's PTO timer is not set too aggressively
+when the server is slow in responding with handshake data.

An ACK of a Handshake packet isn't handshake confirmed, unfortunately.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3665#discussion_r427637132