Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify PTO packets count towards amplification limit (#3539)

ianswett <> Mon, 23 March 2020 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA673A08C1 for <>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saiirBiQn4gu for <>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BE03A08DE for <>; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:29:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584973756; bh=6NSUxN2vU6fp1x8irbteKV/yaxgqlaSEjjDSUMBTP1c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lP12Fo+lpgjl7pCha3OPz7WaQFX655dTmrvbZZYXeafga0BQA+/2yzPC8nqTmtoa/ o+piG14+VKpTdUfYBCsU/zY0UyxrLTDCjTW1mxAOcNIPiJ+aPyYkADvpJthVfAUMyS zUwtl5rmma3kku1vIwwHrPAPLLlXsURWdsKPUibI=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3539/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify PTO packets count towards amplification limit (#3539)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e78c7bc222ab_5b913fb98fccd96c9653d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:29:33 -0000

By not arming the alarm, we avoid the possibility of having the alarm expire, send nothing, and then be immediately re-armed over and over again.  We've hit bugs like that a few times in our implementation, which is why I prefer this structure of not setting the alarm if you can't send anything.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: