IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should QUIC provides PING interface for upper layer? (#3567)

stormlin <notifications@github.com> Fri, 10 April 2020 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B0C3A1A99 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxrAk8oXNoYv for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16A63A1A97 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:51:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1586490665; bh=TV3ERP/qq4hu7cmcrnBNK7F0Ml2CCLvt/u1C1zVyIeU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CY1Q+HJuRUYeRQZLetGb8V+OdsZnbr8UpvNsHQYCgW1wMpAlAS0+sDxH9ylZwGiNp sVJy9atU+t05cP2UF7YXdLgbqt6Lm6zyd57S+iUHcVZqwJmIF3N8GwnU/Ueo94q1Ik +hcIKqXOoc3EeUOpzoxbqBK1Mazu1Q5NwtKO9Ptc=
From: stormlin <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZTD22AGVHJDD3HC2V4TPHCTEVBNHHCHCTWCE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3567/611864644@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3567@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3567@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should QUIC provides PING interface for upper layer? (#3567)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8fed295ed67_13a63fb2c98cd960117157"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: K9A2
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/lWYlW7nhZRnc9gPZONFIBzv91vo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 03:51:08 -0000

Thanks for the comments from @DavidSchinazi, @MikeBishop, @LPardue, and @agrover. It seems that I have think too much on what QUIC spec shoud do. I am going to close this issue, and open seperate issue on QUIC implementations to request such feature.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3567#issuecomment-611864644

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status