Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should QUIC provides PING interface for upper layer? (#3567)

stormlin <> Fri, 10 April 2020 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B0C3A1A99 for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxrAk8oXNoYv for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16A63A1A97 for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:51:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1586490665; bh=TV3ERP/qq4hu7cmcrnBNK7F0Ml2CCLvt/u1C1zVyIeU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CY1Q+HJuRUYeRQZLetGb8V+OdsZnbr8UpvNsHQYCgW1wMpAlAS0+sDxH9ylZwGiNp sVJy9atU+t05cP2UF7YXdLgbqt6Lm6zyd57S+iUHcVZqwJmIF3N8GwnU/Ueo94q1Ik +hcIKqXOoc3EeUOpzoxbqBK1Mazu1Q5NwtKO9Ptc=
From: stormlin <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3567/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should QUIC provides PING interface for upper layer? (#3567)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8fed295ed67_13a63fb2c98cd960117157"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: K9A2
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 03:51:08 -0000

Thanks for the comments from @DavidSchinazi, @MikeBishop, @LPardue, and @agrover. It seems that I have think too much on what QUIC spec shoud do. I am going to close this issue, and open seperate issue on QUIC implementations to request such feature.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: