Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Send after receiving an ACK (#3047)

Jana Iyengar <> Tue, 19 November 2019 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C47120862 for <>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:43:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPHGgXeMP6Wy for <>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:43:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8531200B9 for <>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:43:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:43:29 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1574160209; bh=wnez7+hzGbPw3JojneVtcXIYp1/nOcsDcKqMxDX1Yao=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fw9DpvdvJmbjaVG/2ruqYH8Isg4dna2lgLl37yqLYJ4KTjH4ypeRwKt71QmIQWVmB 2DLZVsfmfngvH8aMYdvI/DKGbr64ghVoMXsUFrk/5cqBEc0O8hb1y4P2z448NFucPI 88rIxEGqbcKoX00vcqxB8n82R9ufBIuQVx+yLYpQ=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3047/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Send after receiving an ACK (#3047)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd3c7517d63e_4f073fd1ad0cd960339f3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:43:32 -0000

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.

> @@ -1031,9 +1031,8 @@ OnAckReceived(ack, pn_space):
     OnPacketAcked(acked_packet.packet_number, pn_space)

Detection of a lost packet at a minimum signals that one packet left the network. This is the logic by which TCP sends a packet immediately on loss detection. It allows a sender to recover from a single packet loss immediately. Do you think we should deviate from what TCP does here?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: