IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames (#1068)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F63D128896 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Efc30SkpgFMs for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486C7127337 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=jd/sEP18ozPlzOe/qddpPSJ3HvI=; b=U7Ld5IAJ9uVaet2t V9sYE2Via8loKepgeCoytMSbnuenV/oQ+cYematxzNcnDkcgHYFAa6BUToDE8D7o PQ2WpNxr4ByH74ZIUvS0fnc8zzuVuL3Q20DeHVd3Au94AB8I6agPpFdqXDtP4VGb lYSMliTq2cC5M1kIruQKN0r82rY=
Received: by filter0125p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0125p1las1-6809-5ACACDA6-2C 2018-04-09 02:19:18.784554968 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id UNfyxaTPTdmyduw69fdpIw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 02:19:18.588 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 02:19:19 +0000
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab198392cd0982083e6fca084311080204144fbbbc92cf0000000116e28fa692a169ce115ea54e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068/c379608300@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Extension frames (#1068)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5acacda67ee49_30352adf0601ced4387525"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3le245WeoYlxAQq00yNIX8nr3w9JrlkPjfPs U2EkwFJRK0mwcG/NyjZDMAODfztHPkzZzKS434+uBk01n+7tHv96UkzeR/sMjidKtSANouuADQh0lu 12aSH1Bg/XWKXjn+loXLKor5vy4kdyU2gYCt4SAiRluOuwSdVnhwnP5rpw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ll9b04OwfoQpFT6FZJMIGZugG-0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 02:19:27 -0000

"That said, though it was already possible to use transport parameters to define new frame types, it wasn't possible to do so without creating a coordination disaster, so we end up here."

I'm not sure where this claim comes from. What's the coordination disaster?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1068#issuecomment-379608300

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status