Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] If you want a Stateless Reset you need to send a much larger packet than before (#2770)

David Schinazi <> Wed, 19 June 2019 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68A3120451 for <>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.391
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B276lTi8Gznp for <>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D99120189 for <>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:11:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560978699; bh=R12gAsg8KpniaupGcoZB7BE//NdZp2IQiGCSlhYhJEo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=r1RbPfTGQe60Vdg9fLG83Xem6Iz2diOqFATaRYZmkUpoRe8EYL3sFGIaSw0HbEP6/ Lk9alCnm8IVwJytVmiSKnvbyE0JM7ChQ5rvOGHYZ9qWbWVGQsw3RE3L0mTVlsFmTVm 4jUDvr0tMKZsFShZE4HqznG4OAnpJCgx8K81SB3Q=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2770/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] If you want a Stateless Reset you need to send a much larger packet than before (#2770)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d0aa50bc5c62_4b53ff9b9acd968415742"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:11:43 -0000

@marten-seemann I'm not sure what you mean by "realistic scenario". The only property we need from a stateless reset is that it *could* be real traffic. The fact that it's unlikely traffic is not really relevant. The stateless reset is already going to stick out due to the fact that there are no subsequent packets after it since it closes the connection.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: