Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add initial threat model to security considerations (#2925)

Eric Kinnear <notifications@github.com> Sat, 16 November 2019 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573AC1200B4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 04:51:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEaq8m3EVHCj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 04:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4044512006D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 04:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-19d82f6.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-19d82f6.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.16.75]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2628E660075 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 04:51:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1573908662; bh=HC54yTXAbSFRUi95Iz3yN2V76KH+ZjUQqAsZv0xi7Pg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mbXwfoPX6IdHo23hgcJPLwwKptmN4vaYzs4TZ87nM5CT38vdvGM3HjIZ/69pJ5EDK 7QEsmQkF+D1eUv2pcvxMZY1vsl2krHNxCuscnOhJInUqjmS6/WaKOV4NwArmRnJ891 bdJAncDZH2u0hg56XeSDeO0DErKDaTrRMxuhfwM8=
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 04:51:02 -0800
From: Eric Kinnear <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYI3M2Y6PDN6TFIWYN33URTNEVBNHHBYGSUE4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2925/review/317969153@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2925@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2925@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add initial threat model to security considerations (#2925)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dcff0b617bab_5e293fdb36ccd96c238641"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/m2ns_c1f6SGEt1QLV5-_sjkPcnY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 12:51:06 -0000

erickinnear commented on this pull request.



> +time for transmission and receipt of non-probing frames.  Path validation
+({{migrate-validate}}) establishes that a peer is both willing and able
+to receive packets sent on a particular path.  This helps reduce the effects of
+address spoofing, by limiting the number of packets sent to a spoofed address,
+unless an attacker is able to also receive packets sent to that address.
+
+This section describes the intended security properties of connection migration
+when under various types of attack, as described in more detail by {{?RFC3552}}.
+
+For this purpose, attacks are divided into passive and active attacks, passive
+attackers having the capability to read packets from the network and active
+attackers having the capability to write packets into the network.
+
+Attackers are additionally categorized as either on-path attackers or off-path
+attackers (see Section 3.5 of {{?RFC3552}}); an on-path attacker is on the
+critical path for a given connection and can read, modify, or remove any packet

Removed in 70dac1d

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2925#discussion_r347090354