Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC connection migration and IPv6 only NAT64/DNS64 Networks (#2122)

janaiyengar <> Thu, 13 December 2018 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2D2126CC7 for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4yR19J5fyB1 for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA11126C01 for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:41 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544680961; bh=eu8d7UVu46kvpWk1n02EfHcvTABBMKMX2PfOAcP/zlQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MExQrXZQjODEDSIqhKCtPQV+BF1Fksm0JXW9GUsl70T9mVrJZRFi5W2I9d69Mna/A SZJ4BKsbWZoQc4HYeQ9C48RC7ftxgBVdGGr4u6Q0D0OjN5TZ2ZAlC/Dqx1fawq1HCe DgXJou0ox0HjCzW79sKbo+nsIoUKBgt7A3KPHr8Q=
From: janaiyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2122/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC connection migration and IPv6 only NAT64/DNS64 Networks (#2122)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c11f601c1844_27113fb72c4d45b82727de"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:02:45 -0000

This is a problem for migration between different address families. It will always fail under those conditions. This is something we should fix, but I fear that without some experimentation, we're not going to get it right. 

I agree with Martin -- having an extension define the alternate v4/v6 address in transport params may be the way to sensibly do this experiment.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: