IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC connection migration and IPv6 only NAT64/DNS64 Networks (#2122)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 13 December 2018 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2D2126CC7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4yR19J5fyB1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA11126C01 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:02:41 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544680961; bh=eu8d7UVu46kvpWk1n02EfHcvTABBMKMX2PfOAcP/zlQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=MExQrXZQjODEDSIqhKCtPQV+BF1Fksm0JXW9GUsl70T9mVrJZRFi5W2I9d69Mna/A SZJ4BKsbWZoQc4HYeQ9C48RC7ftxgBVdGGr4u6Q0D0OjN5TZ2ZAlC/Dqx1fawq1HCe DgXJou0ox0HjCzW79sKbo+nsIoUKBgt7A3KPHr8Q=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8aea754316f147a8f3a2a3a82eb0570b986033e692cf000000011829b80192a169ce1742d117@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2122/446852478@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2122@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2122@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QUIC connection migration and IPv6 only NAT64/DNS64 Networks (#2122)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c11f601c1844_27113fb72c4d45b82727de"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/mI-99kzziEC_VoBT8cq54zx2L8A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:02:45 -0000

This is a problem for migration between different address families. It will always fail under those conditions. This is something we should fix, but I fear that without some experimentation, we're not going to get it right. 

I agree with Martin -- having an extension define the alternate v4/v6 address in transport params may be the way to sensibly do this experiment.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2122#issuecomment-446852478

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status