Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 05:27:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab8480bb4894e5e0f17fd511c8b506a0f609e8fd2d92cf0000000115fd56ce92a169ce0ee9dd49@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732/c337121692@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address validation for connection migration
 (#732)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_59e594ceac9fa_3a023f965fff2f2829797";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/mKyRv3SUT_8oiHfd_OBQUb8Ixf0>

----==_mimepart_59e594ceac9fa_3a023f965fff2f2829797
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Heh, well, either one.  5246 is much, much better, but I think we might be able to improve on that some too.

BTW, if you were tempted to look at 5245 for clues, I would probably try the -bis document, which is nearing completion.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/732#issuecomment-337121692
----==_mimepart_59e594ceac9fa_3a023f965fff2f2829797
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Heh, well, either one.  5246 is much, much better, but I think we might =
be able to improve on that some too.</p>
<p>BTW, if you were tempted to look at 5245 for clues, I would probably try=
 the -bis document, which is nearing completion.</p>

<p style=3D"font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mda=
sh;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<=
br />Reply to this email directly, <a href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/bas=
e-drafts/pull/732#issuecomment-337121692">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href=
=3D"https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkqwyZFhIWgBa_xJJIb=
5h4OyLkgMK4ks5stDrOgaJpZM4O3IIJ">mute the thread</a>.<img alt=3D"" height=
=3D"1" src=3D"https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq5o1lCj0w7kq_y5RA=
mBG5D4LqAqQks5stDrOgaJpZM4O3IIJ.gif" width=3D"1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop=3D"action" itemscope itemtype=3D"http://schema.org/ViewAction=
">
  <link itemprop=3D"url" href=3D"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull=
/732#issuecomment-337121692"></link>
  <meta itemprop=3D"name" content=3D"View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop=3D"description" content=3D"View this Pull Request on GitHub"=
></meta>
</div>

<script type=3D"application/json" data-scope=3D"inboxmarkup">{"api_version"=
:"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"Gi=
tHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg=
/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://clou=
d.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290=
892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/asset=
s/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name=
":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates=
":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@martinthomson in #732: Heh, wel=
l, either one.  5246 is much, much better, but I think we might be able to =
improve on that some too.\r\n\r\nBTW, if you were tempted to look at 5245 f=
or clues, I would probably try the -bis document, which is nearing completi=
on."}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/quicw=
g/base-drafts/pull/732#issuecomment-337121692"}}}</script>=

----==_mimepart_59e594ceac9fa_3a023f965fff2f2829797--